Source: Polar bear - Wikipedia

Caveat: the maps below are likely wrong. Please don't use them as examples of good concept maps. They're only shared publicly to document the tool's evolution.

First Try

Polar bear - A concept map by LLMapper

Fair enough. Relatively simple. Not very informative — just the basic facts.

Second Try

Polar bear - A concept map by LLMapper

A failure. Though this map presents facts and most are arranged as subject-predicate-object sets, there is an unacceptable number of errant pairs. I haven’t yet figured out how to get LLMapper to minimize these.

Third Try

Polar bear - A concept map by LLMapper

Again: simple, factual, and structurally correct. But not very interesting. Could be better if the tool recognized that in this context Bears and Polar bears refer to the same concept.

Comments

I suspect the nature of the subject matter influences the tool’s output. I expect a page like the one for polar bears to be mostly a recitation of facts about the species. That’s reflected in all three maps, which are for the most part unambiguous.

Changes

N/A