Watercolor painting
Source: Watercolor painting - Wikipedia
Caveat: the maps below are likely wrong. Please don't use them as examples of good concept maps. They're only shared publicly to document the tool's evolution.
First Try
Mostly accurate, but suffers from having multiple root concepts. Would be ideal if the first pass could identify a central concept.
Sixth Try
Much better. Some issues, which I suspect are rooted in problems at the summarization step. Inaccuracies. (Paper is made of watercolor?)
Fourteenth Try
Structurally better, even though there are inaccurate relationships. (Paper handles handle?)
Comments
Today’s experiments were a failure. I suspect there’s something particular about certain kinds of Wikipedia articles that lead to multi-root diagrams. The only way I’ll be able to debug this is by exporting the output of the first prompt.
Changes
- Instructed first prompt to have the object of every sentence except the first consist of the object or subject of at least one other sentence in the set.
- Instructed first prompt on subject-predicate-object structures.
- Instructed first prompt to conflate some concepts to minimize their number.
- Modified LLMapper to export the output of the summary step and prompt 1.
- Modified the summary prompt to make it more explicit.
- Switched model for the summarizer — this degraded output, so I switched back to GPT-4.
- Standardized around U.S. spelling.
- Standardized concepts on lowercase (except when they are proper names.)
- Instructed second prompt to only use the sentences in the source text.
- Removed instruction to keep concepts to a minimum.
- Instructed second prompt to remove pairs that include verbs as concepts. (May regret this change down the line.)
- Increased sleep time, since I was getting lots of errors.
- Removed instruction from second prompt that caused GPT-4 to behave like a software developer.
- Explicitly asked the first prompt to pick an existing subject or object.
- Instructed second prompt to always enclose concept names and labels in double quotes.